Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
In Dot Product and its Properties we introduced the dot product, one of two important products for vectors. We will now
introduce the second type of product, called the cross product. There are several important distinctions to keep in mind. First,
the dot product is defined for two vectors of \(\RR ^n\), for any natural number \(n\); the cross-product will only be defined for vectors of \(\RR ^3\).
Second, the dot product is a scalar; the cross product of two vectors will be a vector. Finally, we will find that unlike the dot
product, the cross product is not commutative.
The cross product has many applications in physics and engineering. It also has important geometric properties which will be
addressed in this section and in Determinants as Areas and Volumes.
Preliminaries
In order to define the cross product in a convenient way we need to define \(2\times 2\) and \(3\times 3\) determinants. If you know how to find such
determinants you may skip this section and proceed directly to the definition.
\(2\times 2\) Determinant A \(2\times 2\)determinant is a number associated with a \(2\times 2\) matrix
\[\det {\begin{bmatrix} a & b\\ c & d \end{bmatrix}}=\begin{vmatrix} a & b\\ c & d \end{vmatrix} =ad-bc\]
For more help on \(3 \times 3\) determinants, see Example ?? and the video located there.
Definition of the Cross Product
Let \(\vec {u=\begin{bmatrix}u_1\\u_2\\u_3\end{bmatrix}}\) and \(\vec {v}=\begin{bmatrix}v_1\\v_2\\v_3\end{bmatrix}\) be vectors in \(\RR ^3\). The cross product of \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\), denoted by \(\vec {u}\times \vec {v}\), is given by
What would happen if we took the cross product of the vectors in Example 6 but reversed the order?
Let \(\vec {v}=\begin{bmatrix}-2\\ 4\\ 7\end{bmatrix}\) and \(\vec {u}=\begin{bmatrix}3\\ -10\\ 2\end{bmatrix}\). Recall that \(\vec {u}\times \vec {v}=\begin{bmatrix}-78\\-25\\-8\end{bmatrix}\). We need to compute \(\vec {v}\times \vec {u}\). If you have already studied the effect that switching two rows
of a matrix has on its determinant, you should be able to guess the outcome of the upcoming computation.
This computation shows that the cross product is an operation that is not commutative. It also suggests that switching the
order of the vectors changes the sign of the result.
The Cross Product is not a commutative operation.
Let \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\) be vectors in \(\RR ^3\), then
For the two vectors in each product, sketch the vectors together with the product vector. What do you observe about the
relationship between the cross product and the plane determined by the two vectors in the product?
\(\vec {i}\times \vec {j}=\vec {k}\). Vector \(\vec {k}\) is orthogonal
to both \(\vec {i}\) and \(\vec {j}\).
Orthogonality Property
In this problem we will return to vectors of \(\vec {v}=\begin{bmatrix}-2\\ 4\\ 7\end{bmatrix}\) and \(\vec {u}=\begin{bmatrix}3\\ -10\\ 2\end{bmatrix}\) of Example 6 and Exploration Problem . We know that
It is also easy to verify that \(\vec {u}\dotp (\vec {u}\times \vec {v})=0\) and \(\vec {v}\dotp (\vec {u}\times \vec {v})=0\). Recall that the dot product of two vectors is \(0\) if and only if the two vectors are orthogonal.
(Definition ??) We conclude that, at least in this case, the cross product of two vectors is orthogonal to each of the
vectors.
It turns out that the orthogonality property illustrated by Exploration Problems and holds in general. We state it as a
theorem.
Let \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\) be vectors of \(\RR ^3\), then \(\vec {u}\times \vec {v}\) is orthogonal to both \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\).
This proof can be done by direct computation and is left to the reader. (See Practice Problem )
Cross Product and the Angle between Vectors
Recall that the dot product of \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\) is related to the angle \(\theta \) between \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\) by the following formula
The following theorem establishes a relationship between the magnitude of the cross product, the magnitudes of the two
vectors involved in the cross product and the angle between the two vectors. It is important to note that the identity in this
theorem involves the magnitude of the cross product, not the cross product itself.
Let \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\) be vectors in \(\RR ^3\). Let \(\theta \) be the angle between \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\) such that \(0\leq \theta \leq \pi \). Then
Observe that all magnitudes are non-negative. Also, \(\sin \theta \geq 0\) because \(0\leq \theta \leq \pi \). Taking the square root of both sides give us
Find the cross product \(\vec {u}\times \vec {v}\), and verify that \(\vec {u}\times \vec {v}\) is orthogonal to both \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\). \(\vec {u}=\begin{bmatrix}2\\-1\\4\end{bmatrix}\), \(\vec {v}=\begin{bmatrix}0\\3\\1\end{bmatrix}\).
Let \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\) be vectors of \(\RR ^3\). Prove that \(\vec {u}\times \vec {v}\) is orthogonal to both \(\vec {u}\) and \(\vec {v}\). (Theorem 12)
Prove that the cross product of any vector with itself is the zero vector.