- Verberg vooruitgang Hide progress Toon vooruitgang Show progress
- Verwijder je antwoorden (op deze pagina) Remove your answers (on this page)
Transformations of incidence geometries, permutations, examples, and the group structure of automorphisms.
For this lecture, we will use the following convention: lines are subsets of the set of points. Thus, given a model
we assume that every line \(\ell \in \mathcal L\) is a subset \(\ell \subseteq \mathcal P\), and incidence is the usual relation of belonging:
This is not very restrictive for the incidence geometries we are studying. If \(\mathcal M=(\mathcal P,\mathcal L,\mathcal R)\) satisfies axioms I1 and I2, then each line \(\ell \in \mathcal L\) determines the set
One can replace \(\mathcal L\) by the set of subsets \(\{R(\ell ):\ell \in \mathcal L\}\). This gives an isomorphic model in which lines really are sets of points.
So a transformation does two things:
We denote by \(\operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M)\) the set of all transformations of \(\mathcal M\).
Consider the model with one point
and no lines.
There is only one function \(\mathcal P\to \mathcal P\), namely the function sending \(\ast \) to itself. This function is bijective. Since there are no lines, there is nothing to check about sending lines to lines. Therefore this model has exactly one transformation.
Consider the model \(\mathcal M_2\) with points
and one line
The identity map is a transformation. Indeed, it is a bijection, and
Thus the identity sends the only line to a line.
There is also the map
This map is a bijection. Moreover,
Therefore \(r\) is a transformation.
There are no other transformations. Indeed, let \(f:\mathcal P\to \mathcal P\) be a transformation. Then \(f\) is a bijection, hence injective. If \(f(0)=0\), then \(f(1)\neq 0\), so \(f(1)=1\), and \(f=\operatorname {id}\). If \(f(0)=1\), then \(f(1)\neq 1\), so \(f(1)=0\), and \(f=r\). Therefore
For example, if \(\Sigma =\{0,1,2\}\), then the following are permutations:
The set \(\{0,1,2\}\) has \(6\) permutations. Indeed, to define a permutation, we have \(3\) choices for the image of \(0\). Once this is chosen, we have \(2\) choices left for the image of \(1\), because a permutation is injective. Then there is only \(1\) choice left for the image of \(2\). Thus there are \(3\cdot 2\cdot 1=6\) permutations.
More generally, if \(\Sigma \) has \(n\) elements, then
Indeed, there are \(n\) choices for the image of the first element, \(n-1\) choices for the image of the second element, \(n-2\) choices for the image of the third element, and so on.
Let \(\mathcal M_3\) be the model with points
and lines
Thus the lines are exactly the subsets of \(\mathcal P\) containing two elements.
We claim that
First, every transformation is a permutation of \(\{0,1,2\}\), because a transformation is, by definition, a bijection from the point set to itself. Thus
Conversely, let \(f\in \operatorname {Perm}(\{0,1,2\})\). We show that \(f\) is a transformation. Let \(\ell \) be a line. Since lines in \(\mathcal M_3\) are exactly the two-point subsets, we can write
with \(a\neq b\). Since \(f\) is injective, \(f(a)\neq f(b)\). Hence
is a two-point subset of \(\{0,1,2\}\). Therefore \(f(\ell )\) is a line. Hence \(f\) sends lines to lines, and so \(f\) is a transformation.
Thus
In particular,
The affine plane of order \(2\) has \(4\) points. We label them
In this model, every line contains exactly \(2\) points, and any two distinct points determine a unique line. Therefore the lines are exactly all two-point subsets of \(\mathcal P\).
We claim that
Again, every transformation is a permutation of the point set. Conversely, let \(f\in \operatorname {Perm}(\{0,1,2,3\})\). Let \(\ell \) be a line. Since every line is a two-point subset, we can write \(\ell =\{a,b\}\), with \(a\neq b\). Since \(f\) is injective, \(f(a)\neq f(b)\). Therefore
is a two-point subset of \(\mathcal P\). Since every two-point subset is a line in the affine plane of order \(2\), \(f(\ell )\) is a line. Therefore \(f\) is a transformation.
Thus
In particular, this model has
transformations.
In the previous two examples, every permutation of the point set was a transformation. This is not always true.
Consider the model with points
and lines
Define \(f:\mathcal P\to \mathcal P\) by
This is a permutation of \(\mathcal P\), but it is not a transformation. Indeed,
But \(\{0,1\}\) is not a line in this model. Therefore \(f\) does not send lines to lines.
This example shows that being a permutation is not enough. To be a transformation, a bijection must also preserve the incidence structure.
Consider the model with points
and lines
This is the model appearing in Homework 7.
The line \(\{2,3,4\}\) is special because it is the only line containing three points. Let \(F\) be a transformation. Since \(F\) is bijective, the image of a three-point set is again a three-point set. Since \(F\) sends lines to lines, \(F(\{2,3,4\})\) must be a line with three points. But \(\{2,3,4\}\) is the only such line. Therefore
Since \(F\) is bijective, it sends complements to complements. The complement of \(\{2,3,4\}\) in \(\mathcal P\) is \(\{0,1\}\). Hence
This strongly restricts the possible transformations. In particular, \(F\) must permute the set \(\{2,3,4\}\), and it must also permute the set \(\{0,1\}\). This is the starting point for the Homework 7 problem.
The examples above were finite. We also know many transformations of the usual real affine plane \(\mathbb R^2\).
For example, translations are transformations. If \(v\in \mathbb R^2\), then
is a bijection and sends lines to lines.
Rotations are also transformations. More generally, if \(A\in \operatorname {GL}_2(\mathbb R)\) and \(b\in \mathbb R^2\), then the map
is a transformation of the real affine plane. Later, we will study analogous transformations over \(\mathbb Q\).
The set of transformations of a model has more structure than just being a set. We can compose transformations.
We check the group properties.
First, we check closure. Let \(f,g\in \operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M)\). Since \(f\) and \(g\) are bijections, their composition \(f\circ g\) is also a bijection. We now check that \(f\circ g\) sends lines to lines. Let \(\ell \in \mathcal L\). Since \(g\) is a transformation, \(g(\ell )\) is a line. Since \(f\) is a transformation, \(f(g(\ell ))\) is also a line. But
The identity map is a transformation. It is bijective, and for every line \(\ell \), we have \(\operatorname {id}(\ell )=\ell \). Thus the identity map is the neutral element for composition.
Now let \(f\in \operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M)\). Since \(f\) is a bijection, it has an inverse map \(f^{-1}:\mathcal P\to \mathcal P\). One must check that \(f^{-1}\) sends lines to lines. This is one of the homework exercises, and it uses axioms I1 and I2. Therefore \(f^{-1}\in \operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M)\). By definition of inverse maps,
Finally, composition of maps is associative. Indeed, if \(f,g,h\in \operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M)\), then for every point \(p\in \mathcal P\),