- Verberg vooruitgang Hide progress Toon vooruitgang Show progress
- Verwijder je antwoorden (op deze pagina) Remove your answers (on this page)
Groups of transformations, with a detailed activity on the transformations of the integer line.
Last time, we studied transformations of finite incidence geometries. We used several ideas repeatedly. For example, if a line has two points, then its image under a transformation is again a line with two points. Also, if two lines meet at a point, then their images are two lines meeting at the image of that point.
Today, we study an infinite example.
First, recall that a group is a set \(G\) together with an operation which takes two elements of \(G\) and gives back another element of \(G\). The operation must satisfy the following properties:
In our case, if \(\mathcal M\) is a model satisfying axioms I1 and I2, then \(\operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M)\), with composition, is a group.
In practice, this means:
We now define a model \(\mathcal M_{\mathbb Z}\). The points are
The lines are the subsets of the form
Thus \(\{0,1\}\), \(\{1,2\}\), \(\{2,3\}\), \(\{-1,0\}\), and \(\{-2,-1\}\) are lines.
The goal of this activity is to determine
A transformation of \(\mathcal M_{\mathbb Z}\) is a bijection \(f:\mathbb Z\to \mathbb Z\) such that, for every \(k\in \mathbb Z\), the image
is again a line. In other words, \(f(k)\) and \(f(k+1)\) must be consecutive integers.
No. Let \(f\) be this map. Then
But \(\{0,2\}\) is not a line, because \(0\) and \(2\) are not consecutive. Hence \(f\) is not a transformation.
No. Let \(f\) be this map. Then
Again, \(\{0,2\}\) is not a line. Hence \(f\) is not a transformation.
For every \(\ell \in \mathbb Z\), define
We claim that \(T_\ell \) is a transformation.
First, \(T_\ell \) is a bijection. Its inverse is \(T_{-\ell }\), since \(T_{-\ell }(T_\ell (k))=k\).
Second, \(T_\ell \) sends lines to lines. Indeed,
This is the line
Therefore \(T_\ell \) is a transformation.
Define
We claim that \(s\) is a transformation.
First, \(s\) is a bijection, and \(s^{-1}=s\). Second,
This is a line, because \(-k-1\) and \(-k\) are consecutive. Thus \(s\) is a transformation.
More generally, for any \(a\in \mathbb Z\), the map
is a transformation. It is the composition \(T_a\circ s\).
Let \(f\in \operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M_{\mathbb Z})\). Suppose
We want to reduce to the case where \(0\) is fixed.
Since \(T_{-m}\) is a transformation, the composition
is also a transformation. Moreover,
Now we ask: where can \(g(1)\) go?
Since \(\{0,1\}\) is a line, its image under \(g\) must be a line:
The only lines containing \(0\) are \(\{-1,0\}\) and \(\{0,1\}\). Therefore
Thus every transformation can be normalized so that \(0\) is fixed, and then there are two cases:
or
We now prove that if \(g\in \operatorname {Aut}(\mathcal M_{\mathbb Z})\), \(g(0)=0\), and \(g(1)=1\), then
Since \(\{1,2\}\) is a line, its image is a line:
Thus \(g(2)\) must be adjacent to \(1\). Therefore
But \(g(0)=0\), and \(g\) is injective. Since \(2\neq 0\), we cannot have \(g(2)=0\). Therefore
Since \(\{2,3\}\) is a line, its image is a line:
Thus \(g(3)\) must be adjacent to \(2\). Therefore
But \(g(1)=1\), and \(g\) is injective. Since \(3\neq 1\), we cannot have \(g(3)=1\). Therefore
We now want to show that \(g(k)=k\) for all nonnegative integers \(k\).
When a pattern repeats, a common proof strategy is induction. The idea is the following. Suppose we want to prove a statement \(P(n)\) for every integer \(n\geq 0\). It is enough to prove:
We will use a slightly stronger version, called strong induction. To prove \(P(n)\) for all \(n\geq 0\), we prove:
We prove by strong induction that
for all \(k\geq 0\).
The base case is \(k=0\), and it is true because \(g(0)=0\).
Now assume that \(g(0)=0,g(1)=1,\dots ,g(k)=k\), where \(k\geq 1\). We want to prove that \(g(k+1)=k+1\).
Since \(\{k,k+1\}\) is a line, its image is a line:
Therefore \(g(k+1)\) must be adjacent to \(k\). Hence
But \(g(k-1)=k-1\) by the induction hypothesis, and \(g\) is injective. Since \(k+1\neq k-1\), we cannot have \(g(k+1)=k-1\). Therefore
By strong induction,
for every \(k\geq 0\).