Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
← HW1Week 2 Lecture 1: “summary diagrams”, “Euclid-style” proofs, and more on
postulates→ SectionW2
A discussion of proposition “summary diagrams”, “Euclid-style” proofs, stronger
forms of Postulates 1 and 2, and the definition of right angles and Postulate 4.
Goals for this week
(a)
Create a proposition “summary diagram” for a given proposition and use
them to remember Propositions I.1 to I.34.
(b)
Remember the definition of parallel lines and right angles; the stronger
forms of Postulates 1 and 2, Postulates 4 and 5.
(c)
Apply the known propositions to create new “Euclid-style” proofs.
Roughly speaking:
the diagram shows the situation;
the construction adds the needed objects;
the proof justifies the claim.
Roughly, Book I may be viewed in three parts:
triangles: Propositions I.1–I.26;
parallel lines: Propositions I.27–I.34;
area: Propositions I.35–I.48.
“Summary diagrams” of propositions
We begin with Proposition I.4.
Proposition I.4 (SAS). If two triangles have two sides equal to two sides
respectively, and have the angles contained by the equal straight lines equal, then
they also have the base equal to the base, the triangle equal to the triangle, and the
remaining angles equal the remaining angles respectively, namely those opposite the
equal sides.
Question. How can we make a “summary diagram” for this proposition?
The idea is the following:
mark identically the sides and angles that are given to be equal;
use three colors: one for the initial data, one for the construction, and one
for the conclusion.
For Proposition I.4, the initial data may be summarized as
This is also called the SSS theorem, for side-side-side.
“Euclid-style” proofs
We now practice writing short proofs in the style of Euclid.
Activity 2
Using the postulates and propositions we have seen so far, prove the following
statements using the style of Euclid.
Problem 1
Let \(ABC\) be an isosceles triangle with \(AB=AC\). Suppose \(D\) lies on the segment \(BC\) and that \(BD=DC\), that is, \(D\) is
the midpoint of \(BC\). Show that
\[ \angle BAD=\angle DAC. \]
Idea. The diagram displays the initial information and helps us see what proposition
to apply.
Proof. Consider triangles \(BAD\) and \(DAC\). We have
\[ AB=AC,\qquad BD=DC,\qquad AD=AD. \]
Hence the three corresponding sides are
equal, so by Proposition I.8 (SSS theorem),
\[ \angle BAD=\angle DAC. \]
This is what we wanted to
prove.
Problem 2
Show the converse of Problem 1.
Let \(ABC\) be an isosceles triangle with \(AB=AC\), and let \(D\) be a point on the segment \(BC\). Assume
\[ \angle BAD=\angle DAC. \]
Show
that
\[ BD=DC. \]
Proof. Consider triangles \(BAD\) and \(DAC\). We have
Euclid argues that one may superpose triangle \(ABC\) onto triangle \(DEF\) by placing \(A\)
on \(D\) and \(B\) on \(E\). Then the equality of the included angles and sides forces \(C\) to coincide
with \(F\), and so the side \(BC\) coincides with \(EF\).
Important issues
There are at least two important problems with this argument.
(a)
Superposition is not introduced by the postulates or by previous
propositions.
(b)
Even if \(B\) coincides with \(E\) and \(C\) coincides with \(F\), it is not automatic from the
weak form of Postulate 1 that the line joining \(B\) to \(C\) is the same as the line
joining \(E\) to \(F\).
So Euclid’s proof of Proposition I.4 implicitly uses a stronger form of Postulate 1.
Stronger forms of Postulates 1 and 2
A stronger form of Postulate 1
We will use the following stronger version of Postulate 1.
Postulate 1 (strong form). There exists a unique line passing through any two
distinct points.
This stronger form justifies notation such as:
\(\overleftrightarrow {AB}\) or \((AB)\) for the unique line passing through \(A\) and \(B\);
\(AB\) or \([AB]\) for the segment between \(A\) and \(B\), that is, the points \(D\) on \((AB)\) such that \(D\) is
between \(A\) and \(B\);
\(\overrightarrow {AB}\) for the ray emanating from \(A\) and passing through \(B\), that is, the set of
points \(D\) on \((AB)\) such that \(B\) is between \(A\) and \(D\).
Bonus question
Can you think of a model which has points and lines and satisfies Postulate 1 in its
weak form,
\[ \text {between two points there is a line,} \]
but not in its strong form?
A stronger form of Postulate 2
We will also use the following stronger form of Postulate 2.
Postulate 2 (strong form). If \(A\) and \(B\) are distinct points on a line, then we can
find a point \(D\) on the line, distinct from \(A\) and \(B\), such that \(B\) is between \(A\) and
\(D\).
In other words, a segment may be extended beyond one of its endpoints.
Bonus question
Can you think of a model that has points and lines and satisfies Postulates 1
and 2 in their strong forms, but such that certain lines contain only one
point?
Right angles and Postulate 4
We now discuss Euclid’s definition of a right angle.
Definition 10. When a straight line standing on a straight line makes the
adjacent angles equal to one another, each of the equal angles is right, and the
straight line standing on the other is called a perpendicular to that on which it
stands.
Interpretation. Consider an angle \(\angle BAC\), and choose a point \(D\) on the line \((AB)\) such that \(A\) is
between \(D\) and \(B\). Then \(\angle BAC\) is a right angle if
\[ \angle BAC=\angle CAD. \]
This gives meaning to the picture of a line standing on another line and creating two
equal adjacent angles.
Postulate 4. All right angles are equal to one another.
Final activity
In GeoGebra Classic, create the constructions for Propositions I.9 to I.12 and save
the corresponding new tools. You may see working tools using this link GeoGebra
activity.
If you have time, try to answer the following two questions:
(a)
Can you think of a model which has points and lines and satisfies
Postulate 1 in its weak form but not in its strong form?
(b)
Can you think of a model which satisfies the strong forms of Postulates 1
and 2 but has certain lines with only one point on them?