Je bent je ingevulde velden bij deze pagina aan het verwijderen. Ben je zeker dat je dit wilt doen?
You are erasing your filled-in fields on this page. Are you sure that is what you want?
Nieuwe Versie BeschikbaarNew Version Available
Er is een update van deze pagina. Als je update naar de meest recente versie, verlies je mogelijk je huidige antwoorden voor deze pagina. Hoe wil je verdergaan ?
There is an updated version of this page. If you update to the most recent version, then your current progress on this page will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Axiom I2 is satisfied because each line contains at least two distinct points.
Axiom I3 is also satisfied. For example, the three points \(A,C,D\) are not all incident
with a common line. Indeed, \(C\) and \(D\) lie on \(m\), but \(A\) does not lie on \(m\). The only other
line is \(\ell \), and \(C,D\) do not lie on \(\ell \).
However, axiom I1 is not satisfied. For example, the two distinct points \(A\) and \(C\)
do not have any line incident with both of them. Therefore this model satisfies
I2 and I3, but not I1.
Basic properties of affine planes.
Consider an affine plane \(\mathcal A=(\mathcal P,\mathcal L,\mathcal R)\), that is, assume axioms I1, I2, and I3 are satisfied, and
assume also the Euclidean parallel property:
Given a line \(\ell \in \mathcal L\) and a point \(p\in \mathcal P\) such that \(p\) is not incident with \(\ell \), there exists a unique line \(\ell '\in \mathcal L\)
such that \(\ell \parallel \ell '\) and \(p\,I\,\ell '\).
Show that if two lines \(\ell \) and \(m\) are distinct and not parallel, then there exists a unique
point \(p\in \mathcal P\) such that \(p\,I\,\ell \) and \(p\,I\,m\).
Solution:
Since \(\ell \) and \(m\) are not parallel, by definition they meet. Therefore there exists at
least one point \(p\in \mathcal P\) such that
We now prove uniqueness. Suppose that \(p\) and \(q\) are two points incident with both
\(\ell \) and \(m\). We want to show that \(p=q\).
Assume, for contradiction, that \(p\neq q\). Then by axiom I1, there exists a unique line
incident with both \(p\) and \(q\). But both \(\ell \) and \(m\) are incident with \(p\) and \(q\). Therefore, by
uniqueness in axiom I1, we must have
\[ \ell =m. \]
This contradicts the assumption that \(\ell \)
and \(m\) are distinct.
Hence \(p=q\). Therefore \(\ell \) and \(m\) meet in a unique point.
The standard affine plane over a field.
Let \(\mathbb F=\mathbb R\) (or \(\mathbb Q\), or \(\mathbb C\), or any field of your choice). Consider the affine plane \(\mathbb {F}^2\) defined in
Week 4 Lecture 2. Prove that this affine plane satisfies axiom I3.
Solution:
In the standard affine plane \(\mathbb F^2\), the points are the elements of \(\mathbb F^2\), and the lines are
the subsets of the form
\[ \{(x,y)\in \mathbb F^2: ax+by+c=0\}, \]
where \((a,b,c)\in \mathbb F^3\) and
\[ (a,b)\neq (0,0). \]
Axiom I3 says that there exist three non-collinear points. We claim that the
three points
\[ P=(0,0), \qquad Q=(1,0), \qquad R=(0,1) \]
are not collinear.
Suppose, for contradiction, that \(P,Q,R\) are collinear. Then there exists a line
\[ ax+by+c=0, \]
with \((a,b,c)\in \mathbb F^3\)
and \((a,b)\neq (0,0)\), containing all three points.
Since \(P=(0,0)\) lies on the line, we have
\[ a\cdot 0+b\cdot 0+c=0, \]
so
\[ c=0. \]
Since \(Q=(1,0)\) lies on the line, we have
\[ a\cdot 1+b\cdot 0+c=0, \]
so
\[ a+c=0. \]
Since \(c=0\), this gives
\[ a=0. \]
Since \(R=(0,1)\) lies on the line, we have
\[ a\cdot 0+b\cdot 1+c=0, \]
so
\[ b+c=0. \]
Since \(c=0\), this gives
\[ b=0. \]
Therefore
\[ a=b=c=0. \]
In particular,
\[ (a,b)=(0,0), \]
which contradicts the requirement that \((a,b)\neq (0,0)\).
Hence \(P,Q,R\) are not collinear. Therefore the standard affine plane \(\mathbb F^2\) satisfies axiom I3.
Non-isomorphic models with three points.
Find two non-isomorphic models with exactly three points satisfying axioms I1 and
I2. You may give a picture to define your models, but you also need to prove that
your two models are not isomorphic.
Solution:
Let
\[ \mathcal P=\{A,B,C\}. \]
We define two models.
Model 1. Let
\[ \mathcal L_1=\{\ell \} \]
with
\[ R(\ell )=\{A,B,C\}. \]
Thus all three points lie on a single line.
This model satisfies I1: any two distinct points lie on the unique line \(\ell \). It also
satisfies I2: the line \(\ell \) contains at least two distinct points.
This model satisfies I1: any two distinct points lie on exactly one of the three
lines. It also satisfies I2: each line contains exactly two distinct points. We now
prove that the two models are not isomorphic.
Suppose, for contradiction, that the two models are isomorphic. Then there exist
two bijections
\[ f:\mathcal P_1\longrightarrow \mathcal P_2 \]
and
\[ g:\mathcal L_1\longrightarrow \mathcal L_2 \]
such that incidence is preserved. In other words, for every
point \(P\in \mathcal P_1\) and every line \(r\in \mathcal L_1\),
Let \(\mathcal M=(\mathcal P,\mathcal L,\mathcal R)\) and \(\mathcal M'=(\mathcal P',\mathcal L',\mathcal R')\) be two isomorphic models of incidence geometry. Show that if \(\mathcal M\)
satisfies the elliptic parallel property, then \(\mathcal M'\) also satisfies the elliptic parallel
property.
Assume that \(\mathcal M\) satisfies the elliptic parallel property. This means that any two
lines in \(\mathcal M\) meet.
We want to prove that \(\mathcal M'\) also satisfies the elliptic parallel property. Let \(\ell ',m'\in \mathcal L'\). Since
\(\Phi \) is a bijection, there exist lines \(\ell ,m\in \mathcal L\) such that
\[ \Phi (\ell )=\ell ', \qquad \Phi (m)=m'. \]
Since \(\mathcal M\) satisfies the elliptic parallel
property, the lines \(\ell \) and \(m\) meet. Therefore there exists a point \(P\in \mathcal P\) such that
Since \(\ell '\) and \(m'\) were arbitrary, every pair of lines in \(\mathcal M'\) meets. Therefore \(\mathcal M'\) satisfies the
elliptic parallel property.
Reflection.
Reflect on the first four weeks of lecture.
(a)
What have you enjoyed the most so far?
(b)
Is there something you wish we did more of?
(c)
How will you prepare for the midterm? If you are completing this
homework after the midterm, how did you prepare?
(d)
Are there any points you find, or found, difficult?
(e)
What is your plan to improve on these points?
Please answer in a few complete sentences. Your responses will be anonymous.
Challenge problems.
(a)
(Classifying three-point models) Show that any model with exactly
three points satisfying axioms I1 and I2 is necessarily isomorphic to one
of the two models you found previously in problem 4.
(b)
(Quadrangles in affine planes) Show that any affine plane contains a
quadrangle, that is, a set of four points no three of which are collinear.
(c)
(Finite affine planes \(\dagger \)) Consider an affine plane, and let \(\ell \) and \(m\) be two
distinct lines. Show that the set of points incident with \(\ell \) is in bijection
with the set of points incident with \(m\). Deduce that if one of the lines has \(n\)
points, where \(n\geq 2\) is an integer, then the affine plane has \(n^2\) points. How many
lines does the affine plane have? Are there any affine planes with exactly
\(5\) points?
(d)
(A minimality question \(\dagger \)) Suppose that in a model of incidence
geometry every line has at least three distinct points incident with it.
(i)
What is the least number of points and the least number of lines such
a model can have?
(ii)
Suppose further that the model has the Euclidean parallel property,
that is, suppose it is an affine plane. Show that \(9\) is now the least
possible number of points, and \(12\) is the least possible number of lines.