- Verberg vooruitgang Hide progress Toon vooruitgang Show progress
- Verwijder je antwoorden (op deze pagina) Remove your answers (on this page)
In Section solveeqnsbyfactoring, we reviewed how to solve basic non-linear equations by factoring. The astute reader should have noticed that all of the equations in that section were carefully constructed so that the polynomials could be factored using the integers. To demonstrate just how contrived the equations had to be, we can solve \(2x^2+5x-3=0\) by factoring, \((2x-1)(x+3) = 0\), from which we obtain \(x = \frac {1}{2}\) and \(x = -3\). If we change the \(5\) to a \(6\) and try to solve \(2x^2 + 6x - 3 = 0\), however, we find that this polynomial doesn’t factor over the integers and we are stuck. It turns out that there are two real number solutions to this equation, but they are irrational numbers, and the goal of this section is to review the techniques which allow us to find these solutions. In this section, we focus our attention on quadratic equations.
Think of quadratic equations as equations that are one degree up from linear equations - instead of the highest power of \(x\) being just \(x = x^1\), it’s \(x^2\). The simplest class of quadratic equations to solve are the ones in which \(b = 0\). In that case, we have the following.
If \(c\) is a real number with \(c \geq 0\), the solutions to \(x^2 = c\) are \(x = \pm \sqrt {c}\).
Note: If \(c < 0\), \(x^2 = c\) has no real number solutions.
There are a couple different ways to see why Extracting Square Roots works, both of which are demonstrated by solving the equation \(x^2 = 3\). If we follow the procedure outlined in the previous section, we subtract \(3\) from both sides to get \(x^2 - 3 = 0\) and we now try to factor \(x^2 - 3\). As mentioned in the remarks following Definition irreduciblepoly, we could think of \(x^2 - 3 = x^2 - (\sqrt {3})^2\) and apply the Difference of Squares formula to factor \(x^2 - 3 = (x-\sqrt {3})(x+\sqrt {3})\). We solve \((x-\sqrt {3})(x+\sqrt {3}) = 0\) by using the Zero Product Property as before by setting each factor equal to zero: \(x - \sqrt {3} = 0\) and \(x+\sqrt {3} - 0\). We get the answers \(x = \pm \sqrt {3}\). In general, if \(c \geq 0\), then \(\sqrt {c}\) is a real number, so \(x^2 - c = x^2 - (\sqrt {c})^2 = (x-\sqrt {c})(x+\sqrt {c})\). Replacing the ‘\(3\)’ with ‘\(c\)’ in the above discussion gives the general result.
Another way to view this result is to visualize ‘taking the square root’ of both sides: since \(x^2 = c\), \(\sqrt {x^2} = \sqrt {c}\). How do we simplify \(\sqrt {x^2}\)? We have to exercise a bit of caution here. Note that \(\sqrt {(5)^2}\) and \(\sqrt {(-5)^2}\) both simplify to \(\sqrt {25} = 5\). In both cases, \(\sqrt {x^2}\) returned a positive number, since the negative in \(-5\) was ‘squared away’ before we took the square root. In other words, \(\sqrt {x^2}\) is \(x\) if \(x\) is positive, or, if \(x\) is negative, we make \(x\) positive - that is, \(\sqrt {x^2} = |x|\), the absolute value of \(x\). So from \(x^2 = 3\), we ‘take the square root’ of both sides of the equation to get \(\sqrt {x^2} = \sqrt {3}\). This simplifies to \(|x| = \sqrt {3}\), which by Theorem absvalequality is equivalent to \(x = \sqrt {3}\) or \(x = -\sqrt {3}\). Replacing the ‘\(3\)’ in the previous argument with ‘\(c\),’ gives the general result.
As you might expect, Extracting Square Roots can be applied to more complicated equations. Consider the equation below. We can solve it by Extracting Square Roots provided we first isolate the quantity that is being squared :
Let’s return to the equation \(2x^2 + 6x - 3 = 0\) from the beginning of the section. We leave it to the reader to expand the left side and show that
In other words, we can solve \(2x^2 + 6x - 3 = 0\) by transforming into an equivalent equation. This process, you may recall, is called ‘Completing the Square.’ We’ll revisit Completing the Square in Section QuadraticFunctions in more generality and for a different purpose but for now we revisit the steps needed to complete the square to solve a quadratic equation.
To solve a quadratic equation \(ax^2 + bx + c = 0\) by Completing the Square:
To refresh our memories, we apply this method to solve \(3x^2 - 24x + 5 = 0\):
At this point, we use properties of fractions and radicals to ‘rationalize’ the denominator:
We can now get a common (integer) denominator which yields:
The key to Completing the Square is that the procedure always produces a perfect square trinomial. To see why this works every single time, we start with \(ax^2 + bx + c = 0\) and follow the procedure:
(Hold onto the line above for a moment.) Here’s the heart of the method - we need to show that
To show this, we start with the right side of the equation and apply the Perfect Square Formula from Theorem SpecialProducts
With just a few more steps we can solve the general equation \(ax^{2} + bx + c = 0\) so let’s pick up the story where we left off. (The line on the previous page we told you to hold on to.)
Lo and behold, we have derived the legendary Quadratic Formula!
We can check our earlier solutions to \(2x^2 + 6x - 3 = 0\) and \(3x^2 - 24x + 5 = 0\) using the Quadratic Formula. For \(2x^2 + 6x - 3 = 0\), we identify \(a = 2\), \(b = 6\) and \(c = -3\). The quadratic formula gives:
Using properties of radicals (\(\sqrt {60} = 2 \sqrt {15}\)), this reduces to \(\frac {2(-3 \pm \sqrt {15})}{4} =\frac {-3 \pm \sqrt {15}}{2}\). We leave it to the reader to show these two answers are the same as \(-\frac {3 \pm \sqrt {15}}{2}\), as required.
For \(3x^2 - 24x + 5 = 0\), we identify \(a = 3\), \(b = -24\) and \(c = 5\). Here, we get:
Since \(\sqrt {516} = 2\sqrt {129}\), this reduces to \(x = \frac {12 \pm \sqrt {129}}{3}\).
It is worth noting that the Quadratic Formula applies to all quadratic equations - even ones we could solve using other techniques. For example, to solve \(2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 0\) we identify \(a = 2\), \(b = 5\) and \(c = -3\). Plugging those into the Quadratic Formula yields:
At this point, we have \(x = \frac {-5+7}{4} = \frac {1}{2}\) and \(x = \frac {-5-7}{4} = \frac {-12}{4} = -3\) - the same two answers we obtained factoring. We can also use it to solve \(x^2 = 3\), if we wanted to. From \(x^2 -3 = 0\), we have \(a = 1\), \(b = 0\) and \(c = -3\). The Quadratic Formula produces
As this last example illustrates, while the Quadratic Formula can be used to solve every quadratic equation, that doesn’t mean it should be used. Many times other methods are more efficient. We now provide a more comprehensive approach to solving Quadratic Equations.
Otherwise, put the nonzero terms on one side of the equation so that the other side is \(0\).
The reader is encouraged to pause for a moment to think about why ‘Completing the Square’ doesn’t appear in our list of strategies despite the fact that we’ve spent the majority of the section so far talking about it. Let’s get some practice solving quadratic equations, shall we?
Since \(3 - (2w-1)^2 = 0\) contains a perfect square, we isolate it first then extract square roots:
We find our two answers \(w = \frac {1 \pm \sqrt {3}}{2}\). The reader is encouraged to check both answers by substituting each into the original equation.
To solve \(5x - x(x-3) = 7\), we perform the indicated operations and set one side equal to \(0\).
At this point, we attempt to factor and find \(-x^2 + 8x - 7 = (x-1)(-x+7)\). Using the Zero Product Property, we get \(x-1 = 0\) or \(-x+7 = 0\). Our answers are \(x = 1\) or \(x = 7\), which are easily verified.
Even though we have a perfect square in \((y-1)^2 = 2 - \frac {y+2}{3}\), Extracting Square Roots won’t help matters since we have a \(y\) on the other side of the equation. Our strategy here is to perform the indicated operations (and clear the fraction for good measure) and get \(0\) on one side of the equation.
A cursory attempt at factoring bears no fruit, so we run this through the Quadratic Formula with \(a = 3\), \(b = -5\) and \(c = -1\).
We proceed as before; our goal is to gather the nonzero terms on one side of the equation.
With highly composite numbers like \(100\) and \(441\), factoring seems inefficient at best, so we apply the Quadratic Formula with \(a = 100\), \(b = -420\) and \(c = 441\):
To our surprise and delight we obtain just one answer, \(x = \frac {21}{10}\).
Our next equation \(-4.9t^2 + 10t\sqrt {3} + 2 = 0\), already has \(0\) on one side of the equation, but with coefficients like \(-4.9\) and \(10\sqrt {3}\), factoring with integers is not an option. We could make things a bit easier by clearing the decimal (by multiplying through by \(10\)) to get \(-49t^2 + 100t\sqrt {3} + 20 = 0\) but we simply cannot rid ourselves of the irrational number \(\sqrt {3}\). The Quadratic Formula is our only recourse. With \(a = -49\), \(b = 100\sqrt {3}\) and \(c = 20\) we get:
You’ll note that when we ‘distributed’ the negative in the last step, we changed the ‘\(\pm \)’ to a ‘\(\mp \).’ While this is technically correct, at the end of the day both symbols mean ‘plus or minus’, so we can write our answers as \(t = \frac {50\sqrt {3} \pm 4\sqrt {530}}{49}\). Checking these answers are a true test of arithmetic mettle.
At first glance, the equation \(2x^2 = 3x^4 - 6\) seems misplaced. The highest power of the variable \(x\) here is \(4\), not \(2\), so this equation isn’t a quadratic equation - at least not in terms of the variable \(x\). It is, however, an example of an equation that is ‘Quadratic in Disguise’. We introduce a new variable \(u\) to help us see the pattern - specifically we let \(u = x^2\). Thus \(u^2 = (x^2)^2 = x^4\). So in terms of the variable \(u\), the equation \(2x^2 = 3x^4 - 6\) is \(2u = 3u^2 - 6\). The latter is a quadratic equation, which we can solve using the usual techniques:
We’ve solved the equation for \(u\), but what we still need to solve the original equation - which means we need to find the corresponding values of \(x\). Since \(u = x^2\), we have two equations:
Our last example above, the ‘Quadratic in Disguise’, hints that the Quadratic Formula is applicable to a wider class of equations than those which are strictly quadratic. We give some general guidelines to recognizing these beasts in the wild on the next page.
An equation is a ‘Quadratic in Disguise’ if it can be written in the form: \(ax^{2m} + bx^{m} + c = 0\).
In other words:
To transform a Quadratic in Disguise to a quadratic equation, let \(u = x^m\) so \(u^2 = (x^m)^2 = x^{2m}\). This transforms the equation into \(au^2 + bu + c = 0\).
For example, \(3x^6 - 2x^3 + 1 = 0\) is a Quadratic in Disguise, since \(6 = 2 \cdot 3\). If we let \(u = x^3\), we get \(u^2 = (x^3)^2 = x^6\), so the equation becomes \(3u^2 - 2u + 1 = 0\). However, \(3x^6 - 2x^2 + 1 = 0\) is not a Quadratic in Disguise, since \(6 \neq 2\cdot 2\). The substitution \(u = x^2\) yields \(u^2 = (x^2)^2 = x^4\), not \(x^6\) as required. We’ll see more instances of ‘Quadratics in Disguise’ in later sections.
We close this section with a review of the discriminant of a quadratic equation as defined below.
The discriminant is the radicand of the square root in the quadratic formula:
It discriminates between the nature and number of solutions we get from a quadratic equation. The results are summarized below.
If \(D = 0\), there is one repeated real number solution.
Note: ‘Repeated’ here comes from the fact that ‘both’ solutions \(\frac {-b \pm 0}{2a}\) reduce to \(-\frac {b}{2a}\).
For example, the equation \(x^2 + x - 1 = 0\) has two real number solutions since the discriminant works out to be \((1)^2 - 4(1)(-1) = 5 > 0\). This results in a \(\pm \sqrt {5}\) in the Quadratic Formula which then generates two different answers. On the other hand, \(x^2 + x + 1 = 0\) has no real solutions since here, the discriminant is \((1)^2 - 4(1)(1) = -3 < 0\) which generates a \(\pm \sqrt {-3}\) in the Quadratic Formula. The equation \(x^2 + 2x +1 = 0\) has discriminant \((2)^2 - 4(1)(1) = 0\) so in the Quadratic Formula we get a \(\pm \sqrt {0} = 0\) thereby generating just one solution. More can be said as well. For example, the discriminant of \(6x^2 - x - 40 = 0\) is \(961\). This is a perfect square, \(\sqrt {961} = 31\), which means our solutions are rational numbers. When our solutions are rational numbers, the quadratic actually factors nicely. In our example \(6x^2 - x - 40 = (2x+5)(3x-8)\). Admittedly, if you’ve already computed the discriminant, you’re most of the way done with the problem and probably wouldn’t take the time to experiment with factoring the quadratic at this point – but we’ll see another use for this analysis of the discriminant in Example rationalexpressionreviewex.