- Verberg vooruitgang Hide progress Toon vooruitgang Show progress
- Verwijder je antwoorden (op deze pagina) Remove your answers (on this page)
In Section FunctionArithmetic, we saw how the arithmetic of real numbers carried over into an arithmetic of functions. In this section, we discuss another way to combine functions which is unique to functions and isn’t shared with real numbers - function composition.
To compute \((g \circ f)(x) \), we use the formula given in Defintion functioncompositiondefn: \((g \circ f) (x) = g(f(x))\). However, from a procedural viewpoint, Defintion functioncompositiondefn tells us the output from \(g \circ f\) is found by taking the output from \(f\), \(f(x)\), and then making that the input to \(g\). From this perspective, we see \(g \circ f\) as a two step process taking an input \(x\) and first applying the procedure \(f\) then applying the procedure \(g\). Abstractly, we have:
In the expression \(g(f(x))\), the function \(f\) is often called the ‘inside’ function while \(g\) is often called the ‘outside’ function. When evaluating composite function values we present two methods in the example below: the ‘inside out’ and ‘outside in’ methods.
In numbers fcexvalfirst - fcexvallast, find the indicated function value.
In numbers fcexformfirst - fcexformlast, find and simplify the indicated composite functions. State the domain of each.
By definition, \((g \circ f)(x) = g(f(x))\). We now illustrate two ways to approach this problem.
inside out: We substitute \(f(x) = x^2-4x\) in for \(t\) in the expression \(g(t)\) and get
outside in: We use the formula for \(g\) first to get
To find the domain of \(g \circ f\), we need to find the elements in the domain of \(f\) whose outputs \(f(x)\) are in the domain of \(g\). Since the domain of \(f\) is all real numbers, we focus on finding the range elements compatible with \(g\). Owing to the presence of the square root in the formula \(g(t) = 2 - \sqrt {t+3}\) we require \(t \geq -3\). Hence, we need \(f(x) \geq -3\) or \(x^2-4x \geq -3\). To solve this inequality we rewrite as \(x^2-4x + 3 \geq 0\) and use a sign diagram. Letting \(r(x) = x^2-4x+3\), we find the zeros of \(r\) to be \(x = 1\) and \(x = 3\) and obtain the sign diagram below.
Our solution to \(x^2-4x+3 \geq 0\), and hence the domain of \(g \circ f\), is \((-\infty , 1] \cup [3,\infty )\).
To find \((f \circ g)(t)\), we find \(f(g(t))\).
inside out: We substitute the expression \(g(t) = 2 - \sqrt {t+3}\) in for \(x\) in the formula \(f(x)\) and get
| \((f \circ g)(t)\) | = | \(f(g(t))\) = \(f\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )\) | |
| = | \(\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )^2 - 4\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )\) | ||
| = | \(4 - 4\sqrt {t+3} + \left (\sqrt {t+3}\right )^2 - 8 + 4 \sqrt {t+3}\) | ||
| = | \(4 + t+3 - 8\) | ||
| = | \(t-1\) |
outside in: We use the formula for \(f(x)\) first to get
| \((f \circ g)(t)\) | = | \(f(g(t))\) = \(\left (g(t)\right )^2 - 4\left (g(t)\right )\) | |
| = | \(\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )^2 - 4\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )\) | ||
| = | \(t-1\) | same algebra as before |
Thus we get \((f \circ g)(t) = t-1\). To find the domain of \(f \circ g\), we look for the elements \(t\) in the domain of \(g\) whose outputs, \(g(t)\) are in the domain of \(f\). As mentioned previously, the domain of \(g\) is limited by the presence of the square root to \(\{ t \in \mathbb {R} \, | \, t \geq -3\}\) while the domain of \(f\) is all real numbers. Hence, the domain of \(f \circ g\) is restricted only by the domain of \(g\) and is \(\{ t \in \mathbb {R} \, | \, t \geq -3\}\) or, using interval notation, \([-3, \infty )\). Note that as with Example funcarithex in Section FunctionArithmetic, had we used the simplified formula for \((f \circ g)(t) = t-1\) to determine domain, we would have arrived at the incorrect answer.
To find \((g \circ h)(s)\), we compute \(g(h(s))\).
inside out: We substitute \(h(s)\) in for \(t\) in the expression \(g(t)\) to get
| \((g \circ h)(s)\) | = | \(g(h(s))\) = \(g\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )\) | |
| = | \(2 - \sqrt {\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )+3}\) | ||
| = | \(2 - \sqrt {\frac {2s}{s+1} + \frac {3(s+1)}{s+1}}\) | get common denominators | |
| = | \(2 - \sqrt {\frac {5s+3}{s+1}}\) |
outside in: We use the formula for \(g(t)\) first to get
| \((g \circ h)(s)\) | = | \(g(h(s))\) = \(2 - \sqrt {h(s)+3}\) | |
| = | \(2 - \sqrt {\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )+3}\) | ||
| = | \(2 - \sqrt {\frac {5s+3}{s+1}}\) | get common denominators as before |
To find the domain of \(g \circ h\), we need the elements in the domain of \(h\) so that \(h(s)\) is in the domain of \(g\). Owing to the \(s+1\) in the denominator of the expression \(h(s)\), we require \(s \neq -1\). Once again, because of the square root in \(g(t) = 2 - \sqrt {t+3}\), we need \(t \geq -3\) or, in this case \(h(s) \geq -3\). To use a sign diagram to solve, we rearrange this inequality:
Defining \(r(s) = \frac {5s+3}{s+1}\), we see \(r\) is undefined at \(s=-1\) (a carry over from the domain restriction of \(h\)) and \(r(s) = 0\) at \(s = -\frac {3}{5}\). Our sign diagram is:
hence our domain is \((-\infty , -1) \cup \left [-\frac {3}{5}, \infty \right )\).
We find \((h \circ g)(t)\) by finding \(h(g(t))\).
inside out: We substitute the expression \(g(t)\) for \(s\) in the formula \(h(s)\)
| \((h \circ g)(t)\) | = | \(h(g(t))\) =\(h\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )\) | |
| = | \(\frac {2 \left (2-\sqrt {t+3} \right )}{\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )+1}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {4-2\sqrt {t+3}}{3-\sqrt {t+3}}\) |
outside in: We use the formula for \(h(s)\) first to get
| \((h \circ g)(t)\) | = | \(h(g(t))\) = \(\frac {2 \left (g(t)\right )}{\left ( g(t)\right ) + 1}\) | |
| = | \(\frac {2 \left (2-\sqrt {t+3} \right )}{\left (2-\sqrt {t+3}\right )+1}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {4-2\sqrt {t+3}}{3-\sqrt {t+3}}\) |
To find the domain of \(h \circ g\), we need the elements of the domain of \(g\) so that \(g(t)\) is in the domain of \(h\). As we’ve seen already, for \(t\) to be in the domain of \(g\), \(t \geq -3\). For \(s\) to be in the domain of \(h\), \(s \neq -1\), so we require \(g(t) \neq -1\). Hence, we solve \(g(t) = 2-\sqrt {t+3} = -1\) with the intent of excluding the solutions. Isolating the radical expression gives \(\sqrt {t+3} = 3\) or \(t = 6\). Sure enough, we check \(g(6)=-1\) so we exclude \(t=6\) from the domain of \(h \circ g\). Our final answer is \([-3, 6) \cup (6, \infty )\).
To find \((h \circ h)(s)\) we find \(h(h(s))\):
inside out: We substitute the expression \(h(s)\) for \(s\) in the expression \(h(s)\) into \(h\) to get
| \((h \circ h)(s)\) | \(=\) | \(h(h(s)) =h\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )\) | |
| = | \(\frac {2\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )}{\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )+1}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {\frac {4s}{s+1}}{\frac {2s}{s+1}+1} \cdot \frac {(s+1)}{(s+1)}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {\frac {4s}{s+1} \cdot (s+1)}{\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )\cdot (s+1)+1\cdot (s+1)}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {\frac {4s}{\cancelto {1}{(s+1})} \cdot \cancel {(s+1)}}{\frac {2s}{\cancelto {1}{(s+1)}}\cdot \cancel {(s+1)}+s+1}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {4s}{3s+1}\) |
outside in: This approach yields
| \((h \circ h)(s)\) | = | \(h(h(s)) = \frac {2 (h(s))}{h(s) + 1}\) | |
| = | \(\frac {2\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )}{\left (\frac {2s}{s+1}\right )+1}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {4s}{3s+1}\) | same algebra as before |
To find the domain of \(h \circ h\), we need to find the elements in the domain of \(h\) so that the outputs, \(h(s)\) are also in the domain of \(h\). The only domain restriction for \(h\) comes from the denominator: \(s \neq -1\), so in addition to this, we also need \(h(s) \neq -1\). To this end, we solve \(h(s) = -1\) and exclude the answers. Solving \(\frac {2s}{s+1} = -1\) gives \(s = -\frac {1}{3}\). The domain of \(h \circ h\) is \((-\infty , -1) \cup \left (-1, -\frac {1}{3}\right ) \cup \left (-\frac {1}{3}, \infty \right )\).
The expression \((h \circ (g \circ f))(x)\) indicates that we first find the composite, \(g \circ f\) and compose the function \(h\) with the result. We know from number fcexformfirst that \((g \circ f)(x) = 2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}\) with domain \((-\infty , 1] \cup [3,\infty )\). We now proceed as usual.
inside out: We substitute the expression \((g \circ f)(x)\) for \(s\) in the expression \(h(s)\) first to get
| \((h \circ (g \circ f))(x)\) | = | \(h((g \circ f)(x))=h\left (2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}\right )\) | |
| = | \(\frac {2 \left (2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}\right )}{\left (2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}\right )+1}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {4 - 2\sqrt {x^2-4x+3}}{3 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}}\) |
outside in: We use the formula for \(h(s)\) first to get
| \((h \circ (g \circ f))(x)\) | = | \(h((g \circ f)(x))=\frac {2 \left ( (g \circ f)(x)\right )}{ \left ( (g \circ f)(x)\right ) + 1}\) | |
| = | \(\frac {2 \left (2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}\right )}{\left (2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}\right )+1}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {4 - 2\sqrt {x^2-4x+3}}{3 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}}\) |
To find the domain of \(h \circ (g \circ f)\), we need the domain elements of \(g \circ f\), \((-\infty , 1] \cup [3,\infty )\), so that \((g \circ f)(x)\) is in the domain of \(h\). As we’ve seen several times already, the only domain restriction for \(h\) is \(s \neq -1\), so we set \((g \circ f)(x) = 2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3} = -1\) and exclude the solutions. We get \(\sqrt {x^2-4x+3} = 3\), and, after squaring both sides, we have \(x^2-4x+3 = 9\). We solve \(x^2-4x-6 = 0\) using the quadratic formula and obtain \(x = 2 \pm \sqrt {10}\). The reader is encouraged to check that both of these numbers satisfy the original equation, \(2 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3} = -1\) and also belong to the domain of \(g \circ f\), \((-\infty , 1] \cup [3,\infty )\), and so must be excluded from our final answer. Our final domain for \(h \circ (f \circ g)\) is \((-\infty , 2 -\sqrt {10}) \cup (2 - \sqrt {10}, 1] \cup \left [3, 2 + \sqrt {10}\right ) \cup \left (2+\sqrt {10}, \infty \right )\).
The expression \(((h \circ g) \circ f)(x)\) indicates that we first find the composite \(h \circ g\) and then compose that with \(f\). From number hogex, we have
inside out: We substitute the expression \(f(x)\) for \(t\) in the expression \((h \circ g)(t)\) to get
outside in: We use the formula for \((h \circ g)(t)\) first to get
| \(((h \circ g) \circ f)(x)\) | = | \((h \circ g)(f(x))=\frac {4-2\sqrt {(f(x))+3}}{3-\sqrt {f(x))+3}}\) | |
| = | \(\frac {4 - 2\sqrt {\left (x^2-4x\right )+3}}{3 - \sqrt {\left (x^2-4x\right )+3}}\) | ||
| = | \(\frac {4 - 2\sqrt {x^2-4x+3}}{3 - \sqrt {x^2-4x+3}}\) |
Since the domain of \(f\) is all real numbers, the challenge here to find the domain of \((h \circ g) \circ f\) is to determine the values \(f(x)\) which are in the domain of \(h \circ g\), \([-3, 6) \cup (6, \infty )\). At first glance, it appears as if we have two (or three!) inequalities to solve: \(-3 \leq f(x) < 6\) and \(f(x) > 6\). Alternatively, we could solve \(f(x) = x^2-4x \geq -3\) and exclude the solutions to \(f(x) = x^2-4x = 6\) which is not only easier from a procedural point of view, but also easier since we’ve already done both calculations. In number fcexformfirst, we solved \(x^2-4x \geq -3\) and obtained the solution \((-\infty , 1] \cup [3, \infty )\) and in number hogoffirst, we solved \(x^2-4x-6 = 0\) and obtained \(x = 2 \pm \sqrt {10}\). Hence, the domain of \((h \circ g) \circ f\) is \((-\infty , 2 -\sqrt {10}) \cup (2 - \sqrt {10}, 1] \cup \left [3, 2 + \sqrt {10}\right ) \cup \left (2+\sqrt {10}, \infty \right )\). □
As previously mentioned, it should be clear from Example functioncompex1 that, in general, \(g \circ f \neq f \circ g\), in other words, function composition is not commutative. However, numbers hogoffirst and fcexformlast demonstrate the associative property of function composition. That is, when composing three (or more) functions, as long as we keep the order the same, it doesn’t matter which two functions we compose first. We summarize the important properties of function composition in the theorem below.
By repeated applications of Definition functioncompositiondefn, we find \((h \circ (g \circ f))(x) = h((g \circ f)(x)) = h(g(f(x)))\). Similarly, \(((h \circ g) \circ f)(x) = (h \circ g)(f(x)) = h(g(f(x)))\). This establishes that the formulas for the two functions are the same. We leave it to the reader to think about why the domains of these two functions are identical, too. These two facts establish the equality \(h \circ (g \circ f) = (h \circ g) \circ f\). A consequence of the associativity of function composition is that there is no need for parentheses when we write \(h \circ g \circ f\). The second property can also be verified using Definition functioncompositiondefn. Recall that the function \(I(x) = x\) is called the identity function and was introduced in Exercise identityexercise in Section ConstantandLinearFunctions. If we compose the function \(I\) with a function \(f\), then we have \((I \circ f)(x) = I(f(x)) = f(x)\), and a similar computation shows \((f\circ I)(x) = f(I(x)) = f(x)\). This establishes that we have an identity for function composition much in the same way the function \(I(x) = 1\) is an identity for function multiplication.
As we know, not all functions are described by formulas, and, moreover, not all functions are described by just one formula. The next example applies the concept of function composition to functions represented in various and sundry ways.
\(s\) whose graph is given below:
Find and simplify the following function values:
To find a formula for \((g \circ f)(x) = g(f(x))\), we substitute \(f(x) = 6x-x^2\) in for \(t\) in the formula for \(g(t)\):
Simplifying each expression, we get \( 2(6x-x^2) -1 = -2x^2+12x-1\) for the first piece and \((6x-x^2)^2 = x^4 - 12x^3 +36x^2\) for the second piece. The real challenge comes in solving the inequalities \(-1 \leq 6x-x^2 < 3\) and \(6x-x^2 \geq 3\). While we could solve each individually using a sign diagram, a graphical approach works best here. We graph the parabola \(y = 6x-x^2\), finding the vertex is \((3, 9)\) with intercepts \((0,0)\) and \((6,0)\) along with the horizontal lines \(y = -1\) and \(y=3\) below. We determine the intersection points by solving \(6x-x^2=-1\) and \(6x-x^2=3\). Using the quadratic formula, we find the solutions to each equation are \(x = 3 \pm \sqrt {10}\) and \(x = 3 \pm \sqrt {6}\), respectively.
From the graph, we see the parabola \(y = 6x - x^2\) is between the lines \(y = -1\) and \(y=3\) from \(x = 3- \sqrt {10}\) to \(x= 3 - \sqrt {6}\) and again from \(x = 3+\sqrt {6}\) to \(x=3+\sqrt {10}\). Hence the solution to \(-1 \leq 6x-x^2 < 3\) is \([3- \sqrt {10}, 3 - \sqrt {6}) \cup (3+\sqrt {6}, 3+\sqrt {10}]\). We also note \(y = 6x-x^2\) is above the line \(y=3\) for all \(x\) between \(x=3-\sqrt {6}\) and \(3+\sqrt {6}\). Hence, the solution to \(6x-x^2 \geq 3\) is \([3-\sqrt {6}, 3+\sqrt {6}]\). Hence,
Last but not least, we are tasked with representing \(s \circ h\) as a set of ordered pairs. Since \(h\) is described by the discrete set of points \(h = \{ (-3,1), (-2,6), (0,-2), (1,5), (3,-1) \}\), we find \(s \circ h\) point by point. We keep the graph of \(s\) handy and construct the table below to help us organize our work.
\( \begin{array}{|r||r|c|} \hline x & h(x) & s(h(x)) \\ \hline -3 & 1 & 3 \\ \hline -2 & 6 & \text {undefined} \\ \hline 0 & -2 & 3 \\ \hline 1 & 5 & \text {undefined} \\ \hline 3 & -1 & 3 \\ \hline \end{array} \)
Since neither \(6\) nor \(5\) are in the domain of \(s\), \(-2\) and \(1\) are not in the domain of \(s \circ h\). Hence, we get \(s \circ h = \{ (-3,3), (0,3), (3,3) \}\).
A useful skill in Calculus is to be able to take a complicated function and break it down into a composition of easier functions which our last example illustrates. As with Example funcarithdecompex, we want to avoid trivial decompositions, which, when it comes to function composition, are those involving the identity function \(I(x) = x\) as described in Theorem functioncompprops.
Write each of the following functions as a composition of two or more (non-identity) functions. Check your answer by performing the function composition.
We attack deconstructing \(G\) from an operational approach. Given an input \(t\), the first step is to square \(t\), then add \(1\), then divide the result into \(2\). We will assign each of these steps a function so as to write \(G\) as a composite of three functions: \(f\), \(g\) and \(h\). Our first function, \(f\), is the function that squares its input, \(f(t) = t^2\). The next function is the function that adds \(1\) to its input, \(g(t) = t+1\). Our last function takes its input and divides it into \(2\), \(h(t) = \frac {2}{t}\). The claim is that \(G = h \circ g \circ f\) which checks:
If we look \(H(s) = \frac {\sqrt {s}+1}{\sqrt {s}-1}\) with an eye towards building a complicated function from simpler functions, we see the expression \(\sqrt {s}\) is a simple piece of the larger function. If we define \(f(s) = \sqrt {s}\), we have \(H(s) = \frac {f(s)+1}{f(s)-1}\). If we want to decompose \(H = g \circ f\), then we can glean the formula for \(g(s)\) by looking at what is being done to \(f(s)\). We take \(g(s) = \frac {s+1}{s-1}\), and check below:
To write \(F = f \circ \left (\frac {g}{h} \right )\) means
Working from the inside out, we have a rational expression with numerator \(g(x)\) and denominator \(h(x)\). Looking at the formula for \(F(x)\), one choice is \(g(x) = 2x-1\) and \(h(x) = x^2+4\). Making these identifications, we have
Since \(F\) takes the square root of \(\frac {g(x)}{h(x)}\), the our last function \(f\) is the function that takes the square root of its input, i.e., \(f(x) = \sqrt {x}\). We leave it to the reader to check that, indeed, \(F = f \circ \left (\frac {g}{h} \right )\).
We close this section of a real-world application of function composition.
In Section ??, we studied the difference operator, \(\Delta \) and showed how average rates of change operate with the basic function arithmetic. In this section, we explore how rates of change of composite functions are related to the rates of change of their constituent functions. As in that section, we’ll use the formulation:
adjusting the names of functions and independent variables as needed.
As a motivational example, we revisit the scenario in Example 4.
We start by simplifying \(\frac {\Delta [S(r)]}{\Delta r} = \frac {S(r+ \Delta r) - S(r)}{\Delta r}\):
| \(\frac {\Delta [S(r)]}{\Delta r}\) | \(=\) | \(\frac {S(r+ \Delta r) - S(r)}{\Delta r}\) |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {4 \pi (r + \Delta r)^2 - 4 \pi r^2}{\Delta r}\) | |
| \(=\) | \( \frac {4 \pi \left [r^2 + 2 r \, \Delta r + (\Delta r)^2\right ] - 4 \pi r^2}{\Delta r}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {4 \pi r^2 + 8 \pi r \, \Delta r + 4 \pi (\Delta r)^2 - 4 \pi r^2}{\Delta r}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {8 \pi r \, \Delta r + 4 \pi (\Delta r)^2 }{\Delta r}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {(\Delta r) \left (8 \pi r + 4 \pi \, \Delta r \right ) }{\Delta r}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {\cancel {(\Delta r)} \left (8 \pi r + 4 \pi \, \Delta r \right ) }{\cancelto {1}{(\Delta r)}}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(8 \pi r + 4 \pi \, \Delta r\) |
To find the average rate of change of \(S\) over the interval \([1,3]\), we take \(r = 1\) and \(\Delta r = 3 - 1 = 2\):
This means as the radius of the balloon increases from \(1\) centimeter to \(3\) centimeters, the surface area is increasing at an average rate of \(16 \pi \, \frac {\text {cm}^2}{\text {cm}} \).
Note that the units here, cm, do cancel and we could write the average rate of change as \(16 \pi \) cm. This somewhat hides the fact this number represents a ratio. Any time area and length are measured in compatible units, the ratio of units \(\frac {\text {area}}{\text {length}}\) will simplify to units of length.
Next, we simplify \(\frac {\Delta [r(t)]}{\Delta t} = \frac {r(t+ \Delta t) - r(t)}{\Delta t}\):
| \( \frac {\Delta [r(t)]}{\Delta t}\) | \(=\) | \(\frac {r(t+ \Delta t) - r(t)}{\Delta t}\) |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {2(t+\Delta t)- 2t}{\Delta t}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {2t + 2 \Delta t - 2t}{\Delta t}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac { 2 \cancel {\Delta t} }{\cancelto {1}{(\Delta t)}}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(2\) |
The fact that the average rate of change here is constant shouldn’t be too surprising. Note \(r(t) = 2t\) is a linear function with slope \(2\). Hence, ‘\(2\)’ is the (constant) rate of change of \(r\). This means that the radius of the balloon is increasing at a constant rate of \(2\) \(\frac {\text {cm}}{\text {min}}\).
To find \(\frac {\Delta [S(t)]}{\Delta t} = \frac {S(t+ \Delta t) - S(t)}{\Delta t}\), we start with our answer from Example 4: \(S(t) = 16 \pi t^{2}\) :
| \(\frac {\Delta [S(t)]}{\Delta t}\) | \(=\) | \(\frac {S(t+ \Delta t) - S(t)}{\Delta t}\) |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {16 \pi (t+ \Delta t)^2 - 16 \pi t^2}{\Delta t}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {16 \pi \left [ t^2 + 2 t \, \Delta t + (\Delta t)^2\right ] - 16 \pi t^2}{\Delta t}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {16 \pi t^2 + 32 \pi t \, \Delta t + 16 \pi (\Delta t)^2 - 16 \pi t^2}{\Delta t}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {32 \pi t \, \Delta t + 16 \pi (\Delta t)^2}{\Delta t}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {(\Delta t) (32 \pi t + 16 \pi \, \Delta t)}{\Delta t}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(\frac {\cancel {(\Delta t)} (32 \pi t + 16 \pi \, \Delta t)}{\cancelto {1}{(\Delta t)}}\) | |
| \(=\) | \(32 \pi t + 16 \pi \, \Delta t\) |
To find the average rate of change of \(S\) over the interval \(\left [\frac {1}{2}, \frac {3}{2}\right ]\), we take \(t = \frac {1}{2}\) and \(\Delta t = \frac {3}{2} - \frac {1}{2} = 1\):
This means the surface area of the balloon is increasing at an average rate of \(32 \pi \) \(\frac {\text {cm}^2}{\text {min}}\) over the time span of \(\frac {1}{2}\) minute (\(30\) seconds) after the start of inflation to \(\frac {3}{2}\) (\(90\) seconds) after the start of inflation.
We begin with:
which doesn’t look like much unless we substitute \(r = 2t\) and \(\Delta r = 2 \Delta t\). We get:
| \(\frac {\Delta [S(r)]}{\Delta r} \cdot \frac {\Delta [r(t)]}{\Delta t}\) | \(=\) | \((8 \pi r + 4 \pi \, \Delta r)(2)\) |
| \(=\) | \((8 \pi (2t) + 4 \pi \ (2 \Delta t)(2)\) | |
| \(=\) | \((16 \pi t + 8 \pi \, \Delta t)(2)\) | |
| \(=\) | \(32 \pi t + 16 \pi \, \Delta t\) |
We find in this case,
Moreover, we note that the time interval \(\frac {1}{2} \leq t \leq \frac {3}{2}\) corresponds to the interval \(1 \leq r \leq 3\) so it makes sense to multiply our numerical answers as well:
Example 5 verifies a property of rates we formalize below.
If we think of \(u\) as being an ‘intermediary’ variable, Theorem 2 allows us to determine the rate of change of \(f\) with respect to \(x\) by multiplying the rate of change of \(f\) with respect to this ‘intermediary’ \(u\) by the rate of change of the ‘intermediary’ \(u\) with respect to \(x\). That is, we are looking for rate information on how \(f\) depends on \(x\) by decomposing the rate into two rates as visualized below.
We close the section with one last example.
To find \(\frac {\Delta [F(v)]}{\Delta v}\) as the speed changes from \(5\) \(\frac {\text {m}}{\text {s}}\) to \(6\) \(\frac {\text {m}}{\text {s}}\), we calculate:
The units on \(\frac {\Delta [F(v)]}{\Delta v}\) would be the units of \(F\), N, divided by the units of \(v\), \(\frac {\text {m}}{\text {s}}\) which works out to \(\frac {\text {N s}}{\text {m}}\).
Hence,
The force is increasing at an average rate of \(64.68\) Newtons per second.
Note that we never needed to know explicitly how the speed, \(v\), directly depended on time in order to answer the question posed in Example 6. All we needed was the rate.